Remember back to a time not in the too distant past when the coalition government was formed. A time when the newly formed government said they were committed to having a bonfire of the quango and tearing down the red tape that strangles not just businesses but individuals also.

Fast forward to today and we can all see that none of this has happened. Yes a few quangos have been got rid of here and there, red tape torn down but replaced elsewhere. It’s a joke really.

One thing, which I know will prove a controversial subject would be to repeal all of the equality and anti discrimination legislation. When you have a long hard think about what this legislation has actually achieved, you realise it changes nothing. My view on matters such as these is that if they are unenforceable it’s a complete waste of time. Let’s be real, you cannot force this kind of thing on society.

How can the state control what is going on in an interviewers head when he is making a choice on picking a candidate for a job. Regardless of if his decision was made from a fair, sexist, anti disabled or racist stand point, the state cannot control what this person is thinking. This is the realist view of it.

Now a look at it through the eyes of Libertarian ideals. Those Libertarians out there, like myself, think it out of the question that the state should dictate to businessman (or businesswomen if you want to be PC) what they can and cannot do. If a businessman happens to not like someone for whatever reason , I think it right that it should be the choice of the owner to employ who he wants. After all, the business is his property and as Libertarians are Capitalists, we believe in private property rights and what you do with your own property (your business) should be down to you (the owner) and not of the state. By allowing the state to legislate on these matters holds the theory that the state owns us and that we are not individual free human begins.

A prime example of this is the case of Mr and Mrs Bull the devout Christian hotel owners who refused their service to a homosexual couple. I myself disagree with it, but believe it be the right of these people to do as they wish with their property, their business.

Any decent Libertarian would always say that they do not support discrimination but if we are to live as a free people in a free society we should have the right to discriminate on whatever the issue would be.

Current “equality” legislation is actually discriminatory. Take for example female quotas on the work place. That is discrimination against a male who may have come across better in the interview and had more experience that the female. We know this as positive discrimination and it is becoming pervasive throughout society.

Oh and before people start calling “racist, homophobic, Xenophobic” etc, I must let you know I believe in a meritocracy and freedom of thought, speech and expression. I believe these core rights to be

inalienable.  

I leave you with a quote from Nigel Farage which sums up my thoughts; “Freedom of speech and belief is not subject to approval by a transitory authority. It is absolute or it is nothing”

This country is heading toward a very dangerous place. Liberty lovers like myself will know where this article is heading when I utter the words Green Party and Fascism.

The day has come where people are being told what they can and cannot eat by a certain repulsive local authority, namely that of Brighton and Hove Council. Who are these people to take such fundamental liberties as the right to eat as I wish.

Meat free Monday is the new thing in council buildings under the mentally unstable Greens dictatorship of Brighton. MP for Brighton Pavilion Führer Caroline Lucas defended little Gauleiter, head of Brighton Council, Cllr Amy Kennedy’s dictatorial moves to impose on Council workers “meat free” Mondays. To no surprise the moronic Greens have somehow managed to link eating meat to “saving the world”. What’s that buzzword being used now…..? That’s it “Climate Change, yes apparently eating meat causes that.

Seriously what a joke, who the hell are they to do this. If I want to eat meat I will. No Nazi will tell me otherwise.

I found it hysterical when the Bolshy Broadcasting Corporation interviewed a moron of a bartender in Brighton on what Green policies are good. The fact he could not give a coherent answer says it all.

If people start accepting what these thick scumbags are doing it is the end of Liberal Western Democracy as we know it and will give rise again to Communism disguised as Greenism like a chameleon.

In other lunatic news, New York City has banned smoking everywhere apart from your own home. How long until these oppressive loons bring it over to Britain. I guess not long.

Look we live in the 21^st century. Being homosexual is nothing to be ashamed of and is accepted in modern day society. So I, as a taxpayer find it absolutely disgusting that he has the neck on him to hide behind the fact he was gay!

Right so we have Laws giving £40,000 to his boyfriend. His reasons for keeping it secret are because he didn’t want the public to find out. To me it sounds like the perfect front for a criminal racket. After all, the MP’s expenses system is a racket. Any private citizen or companies directors caught committing fraud would be in the docks where they should be, being judged by their peers in a court of law.

What gets me the most, is these stupid sayings such as “it was within the rules”. I could not care less what IPSA say about the matter and to me IPSA is just a pathetic bureaucrats wet dream that should have no dealings with crimes such as these. Why can’t MP’s claims be audited by an accountant and then legal action taken if they are suspected of defrauding the taxpayer. Also last time I checked IPSA did not seem very independent to me.

Laws you are not above the law sir! No one is. This was clear in 1215 at Runneymede and incorporated into common law due to the Magna Carta.

This case does show the kind of self interest and elitist dogma which has diseased modern day politics. It seems like it is one rule for the elitist pigs and one rule for us, the Proles.

David Laws fiddled his expenses. He should face the force of law end of.

However yet again my favourite Trotskyites in the EU think it’s a fabulous idea to impose “EU Day” on our great nation.

“EU Day” will entail mass fines to public buildings who do not hoist the ugly blue and gold euro flag for a whole week. There will also be a classical music concert in London celebrating the Hungarian presidency at the cost of £20,000 to the taxpayer.

Worst of all which has really got up my nose is the fact that emails from the European commission to schools around the country have been sent explaining on how best to celebrate this bizarre notion of “EU Day”. Schools have been “advised” that they should have European themed assemblies to celebrate the day. Other “recommendations” are to have a European café which ONLY accepts Euros.

To me this is the attempt to kill off Euro scepticism in the next generation by nothing more than indoctrination. It’s an utter disgrace.

This is nothing about culture or diversity, it’s about the undermining of our sense of national identity.

A new ComRes poll for the EU Referendum Campaign, published today, shows that a large majority of Conservative and Liberal Democrat voters want their parties to commit to a referendum on continued EU membership.
 
In a week that has seen controversy over the UK’s exposure to a bailout of the Portuguese economy, the poll also found that fully two-thirds of the public oppose Britain contributing financially to it.
 
James Pryor, Chief Executive of the EU Referendum Campaign, said “Again, our polls show the disconnect between the politicians and the people. Both David Cameron and Nick Clegg should seriously consider asking their own parties how they feel on an in/out referendum. I am not sure whether it is sheer arrogance or just plain stupidity to ignore the wishes of their own supporters. What are they afraid of?”
 
Andrew Hawkins, Chairman of ComRes, said “The EU undoubtedly has a major image problem.  Fewer than one in three people feel Britain gets a good deal from being a member of the EU and almost half regard the EU as ‘fundamentally undemocratic’.  These are problems that, unless addressed, will be left to fester in the minds of the electorate.”
 
Full results:
 
I want my party to commit to a referendum on continued EU membership
Agree: 53%
Disagree: 35%
Don’t know: 12%
 
(Conservative (63%) and Liberal Democrat voters (66%) are more likely than Labour voters (48%) to say that they want their party to commit to a referendum on continued EU membership.)
         
The EU is fundamentally undemocratic
Agree: 45%
Disagree: 36%
Don’t know: 19%
 
Britain gets a good deal from being a member of the EU
Agree: 29%
Disagree: 55%
Don’t know: 16%
 
If more Eurozone Countries like Portugal need bailouts then Britain should contribute to them
Agree: 25%
Disagree: 67%
Don’t know: 8%
  

 
This fits in with the hypocritical Communist agenda on the assault on liberty and any associated icon of capitalism because those reds hate the fact a individual human can be successful in life and afford a car. I say hypocritical because don’t forget in communism the rules don’t apply to the elite. A car if a symbol of liberty, freedom and capitalism. The only cars in communism are the ones granted by the state. In a liberal capitalist it is your liberty to have one.
 
It all comes with the ridiculous ambition of making cuts of 60% in C02 emissions by 2050. First of all the Global Warming theory (sorry I mean swindle) has not even been proven and one could even argue it has been disprove by looking at some of the evidence set forward by some scientists. So it’s a lunatic notion to cut emissions to such levels. They are imposing all this upon us and will send us back to the Dark Ages.
　
It really is like something out of the George Orwell novel 1984. I wonder if the commission is using it as a manual for governing their utopian superstate once all the pieces are in place. All the nonsensical talk about cutting emissions by a set date really is sounding like something out of 1984. If they reach the target (which I doubt) or not is irrelevant because they will just say they have and probably say they have made even better progress that anticipated comrade. Who are we proletarians to know how to measure carbon anyway or even to question our overlords at the EU Come to think of it words such as anticipate may not even exist in 2050 as Orwellian newspeak might exist. Well the quality of English Language in our educational institutions has been eroding a lot over the years.
 
However there is hope (well a strand). Norman Baker the British transport minister did say “We will not be banning cars from city centres anymore than we will be having rectangular bananas”. But we all know the EU will get it’s way if it really wants to and the British Government will have a collective loss of nerve in standing up to the EUSSR and will surrender to the demands of their commie masters.

I thought what rank hypocrites they are. How on earth can they support military action against the despotic and arbitrary regime of Colonel Gaddafi whilst at the same time supporting the crack down on pro-democracy protestors in Bahrain. Listening to this nonsense is like doublespeak out of 1984.

I just cannot get my head around the fact that they can preach for democratic rights for one set of people under despotic rule in Libya but support the crack down against protestors desperate for democracy by the despotic regime of Bahrain. But silly me, the dictatorial government of Bahrain is friendly with the west. Libya fell from grace so we had to invade to bring them…. ‘erm, stability and democracy to the region…. Yeah Right. More like the thoughts going through the head of western governments and corporations were money oil, money, oil.. Oh and an arms sale or two.

Anyway people who know me, know full well I am against intervention into business that has nothing to do with us. Reasons ranging from cost of operations to the fact we will do more damage than good.

We cannot argue for intervention whilst not intervening in so many other countries in the world.

It’s great what The Peoples Pledge are doing, but one must ask ones self, for what purpose? We already have “The EU Referendum Campaign” headed by Jon Gaunt and James Pryor, so why do we need another campaign group?

I am slightly concerned that The Peoples Pledge is going to distract attention from “The EU Referendum Campaign” (one that I wholeheartedly support). I have heard whispers from some Tory friends of mine who have even gone as far to say that The Peoples Pledge could just be a distraction for Tory “Euroseceptic Right” to stop them looking or thinking about defecting to UKIP.

Anyway I can’t trust 100% an organisation that has Virginia the sicko Ironside listed as a key supporter.

For those of you who are unaware, Virginia Ironside called for the smothering of disabled babies while on the BBC show “Sunday Morning Live”

For now I will watch The Peoples Pledge very closely.

We still have Gaunty and The EU Referendum Campaigns back!

Anyway the momentum is drastically picking up for a referendum on the EU. What I love mostly about this new group is that it’s supporters are Eurosceptics and Europhiles who both have the belief in democracy, unlike certain others. This is also a tool to see as clear as day the MP’s who do not believe in the democratic process. To name a few Dave Cameron, Red Milliband, Ken Clarke and Stephen McPartland.

This leads me on to another related subject. People are going to think okayyyy why has he thrown McPartlands name in there, for he is just a mere backbench Tory MP. Well I have my reasons for chucking McPartland in there. I have it in big time for Stephen McPartland because he is the prime example of the modern day wannabe professional career class of politician who’s ultimate goal is self perpetuation into a nice cushy ministerial job. He doesn’t even sing the party line, he screams it, he brown noses Cameron to such an extent that his head could probably emerge out of Dave’s mouth. He is also the MP who represents me in Stevenage. I have sent numerous correspondence to him regarding what his position will be on a vote relating to the EU, and time and time again all the letters I get in response solidify his position as a Europhile and a Europhile who doesn’t even want a referendum. Shows he is a firm believer in democracy aye? In my last letter I offered him to a public debate on the EU. As of yet I have no reply.

Moving on from my dislike of Stephen McPartland. We have David Cameron our dear leader telling Peter Bone MP in Prime Ministers Questions that he believes that Britain is better off in the EU. Still no referendum Dave? What about your “Cast Iron Guarantee” on a referendum? What about democracy? What about the will of the people

Also the great Red Ed Milliband doesn’t believe in democracy either. When asked by the Daily Express if he would back a referendum his response was “it seems to me that we made our decision in 1975. I think it was the right decision”. Red seriously? How out of touch can you get. No one under the age of 54 has ever had a say on how they are governed. Those who did vote in 1975 did not vote for a European Union, they voted for a common market, a trade agreement. Maybe a legal case under the 1967 Misrepresentation Act is in order to nullify the 1972 European Communities act.

What qualifies these people to make these decisions that are clearly not the will of the people.

Do these political elites not remember who their bosses are? It’s us the taxpayer! What part of Civil Servant don’t they understand?

The question I ask myself is, are these people thick?

This battle for a referendum is about our right to self determination.

Secondly I have to say I was wrong about Zac Goldsmith. At the election I was hoping he would not win his seat. This was because I had the man down as a Eco green nutcase. By nature most greens are pro European. However Zac Goldsmith voting for an in/out referendum took me off guard.  I said i was wrong and he must be true to the cause of that his father Jimmy Goldsmith was.     

I can’t quite get my head around why these politicians continue to go against public opinion and continually subverting British democracy. Do they not remember that they were elected by the people to serve the people. We pay their wages so therefore we are their employers and they are the employees. In the real world you would be sacked, so i ask of the people now to sack your MP at the next election and put someone in who will listen to the people. Remember elections are not just about the right to elect your representative and government, it is also the right to get rid of them.